Dispute Settlement Mechanism of WTO: Challenges and Solutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69971/lra.3.1.2025.70Keywords:
international trade law, WTO dispute settlement body, dispute settlement mechanism, alternative dispute resolution, dispute settlement understandingAbstract
The Dispute Settlement Mechanism (DSM) of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) has been recognised as a fundamental element of the multilateral trading system, promoting the enforcement of trade regulations and enhancing predictability in international trade. Nevertheless, the mechanism has faced several structural and political obstacles in the last ten years that jeopardise its effectiveness and credibility. This paper provides a critical analysis of the development, operation, and current crisis of the WTO’s DSM, placing particular emphasis on the standstill in the Appellate Body since 2019, which results from the United States’ ongoing obstruction of judicial appointments. The paralysis at the appellate level has weakened the dispute resolution process and raised concerns about the rule-based framework governing international trade. The study investigates the inherent limitations of the DSM, including delays in adjudication, challenges with compliance, and power imbalances between developed and developing nations. It underscores how these challenges impede fair access to justice for smaller economies and impact the overall trustworthiness of the WTO. It engages with academic discussions and member-state proposals for reform, such as interim arrangements like the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA), procedural innovations, and broader institutional changes. While the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Mechanism is still crucial for sustaining the global trade order, its present obstacles call for immediate reform. Without comprehensive and collaborative initiatives to restore and modernise the system, the future of multilateral trade governance may trend towards fragmentation and unilateralism, jeopardising years of progress in international economic law. This study contributes to the ongoing conversation by suggesting balanced and implementable reforms designed to safeguard the integrity and functionality of the DSM amidst a swiftly changing geopolitical landscape.
References
Chouhan, Yash Singh. 2021. WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism in Contemporary Context. International Journal of Advanced Legal Research 1:1-14. https://ijalr.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Articlee-neww.pdf
Gandhi, Aesha. 2025. A critical analysis of the procedure of dispute resolution mechanism of world trade organisation (WTO). The Academic 3: 920-933. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14852653
Madhumitha, Dharmapuri Selvakumar, 2020. WTO-Analysis of Issues with the Dispute Settlement Mechanism. Beijing Law Review 11: 879–88. https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2020.114052
Nair, Abhishek. 2023. 2023. Challenges of WTO dispute settlement mechanism. Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research V:1-13. https://www.ijllr.com/post/challenges-of-wto-dispute-settlement-mechanism
Padhi, Ipsita Aparajita .2023. Challenges and remedies to WTO dispute settlement. https://articles.manupatra.com/article-details/Challenges-and-Remedies-to-WTO-Dispute-Settlement
Parveen, Mariyam. 2015. Dispute settlement mechanism under the WTO. https://www.lawctopus.com/academike/dispute-settlement-mechanism-wto/
Sehgal, Diganth Raj. 2020. Understanding the WTO appellate body crisis & solutions. IPleaders. https://blog.ipleaders.in/understanding-wto-appellate-body-crisis-solutions/
Verma, Ayush. 2021. What You Should Know about the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism. IPleaders. https://blog.ipleaders.in/know-wto-dispute-settlement-mechanism/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.