Using AI in International Arbitration: From Predictive Analytics to Automated Awards

Authors

  • Daniyal Shoukat Department of Law, University of Punjab, Jhelum Campus, Jhelum, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69971/lra.3.2.2025.87

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, international arbitration, dispute resolution, algorithmic bias, regulatory challenges, hybrid systems, predictive analysis, research automation

Abstract

Modification International arbitration with the application of artificial intelligence (AI) does not leave all opportunities revolutionary, nor are all material challenges. The given discussion gives an overview of the growing use of AI in the fields of arbitrator selection, collection of evidence, predictive analysis, automation of legal research, and online dispute resolution. It emphasizes the way AI can be used to enhance efficiency, decrease expenses, as well as make better decisions based on advanced data analysis. Moreover, technology can enhance accessibility, include cultural sensitivity into transnational conflicts and strategically contribute to the legal environment. The application of AI in complex scenarios, however, has certain limitations caused by such factors as data shortage, regulatory risk, ethical issues, and technological limitations. Such issues are also complicated by the risk of privacy, algorithmic bias, and differences in terms of legal status of the AI-generated awards. One of the solutions is a hybrid system that would integrate the benefits of AI with the control of human beings, particularly in investment-state arbitrations and digitalization in the post-pandemic world. Nowadays, legal regulations, including the United States Federal Arbitration Act and the New York Convention, are not clear enough in the context of AI-generated awards, which is why they should be updated. In conclusion, the paper highlights the need to have a moderate integration of AI to settle the ethical concerns and utilize its potential to revolutionize international dispute resolution.

References

Agus, Agus, Sudirman Sudirman, Wahyudi Umar, and Ahmad Rustan. 2023. The use of artificial intelligence in dispute resolution through arbitration: the potential and challenges. Sasi 29: 570-578. https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/1393

Alsamhan, Eyad Ayed. 2023. AI and online dispute resolution: mediation. Journal of Scientific Development for Studies and Research 4: 283-300. https://doi.org/10.61212/jsd/113

Azab, Rania S. and Hosameldin H. Ismail. 2024. AI as a tool to enhance digital arbitration effectiveness (analytical study under silicon valley arbitration center guidelines). Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology 8: 1723-1734. https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/2333

Bernhardt, W. 2021. The use of artificial intelligence in the field of justice. In Internet and New Technologies Law: 173-196. https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/9783748926979-173.pdf

Broyde, Michael and Yiyang Mei. 2024. Don't Kill the Baby: The Case for AI in Arbitration. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn

Dar, Wasiq Abass, and Boris Prastalo. 2023. The investor-state arbitration legitimacy crisis: could ai be its future savior (or resurrector)? Pravni Zapisi 14: 21-58. https://pure.jgu.edu.in/id/eprint/6338

De'Shazer, Michael. 2024. Advancing legal reasoning: the integration of ai to navigate complexities and biases in global jurisprudence with semi-automated arbitration processes (SAAPs). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.04140

Eidenmueller, Horst and Varesis F. 2020. What is an arbitration? Artificial intelligence and the vanishing human arbitrator. New York University Journal of Law & Business 17: 49-94. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3629145

Ermakova, Elena. 2023. The philosophical and legal rationale for a systematic analysis of digital dispute resolution models in modern arbitration. Wisdom 28. https://wisdomperiodical.com/index.php/wisdom/article/view/1037

Hussain, Mohammad Azam, Mohamad Fateh Labanieh, Nazli Mahdzir, Nooraini Sulaiman and Omar S. A. Bawazir. 2023. The potential prospect of artificial intelligence (AI) in arbitration from the international, national, and islamic perspectives. Journal of International Studies (JIS) 19: 95-122. https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/jis/article/view/16704

Kalalo, P. Flora, and Kathleen C. Pontoh. 2020. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in legal framework for international arbitration practices in Indonesia. Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution International Conference (ADRIC 2019): 6-10. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200917.002

Kraus, Sarit, Penina Hoz-Weiss, Jonathan Wilkenfeld, David R. Andersen, and Amy A. Pate. 2008. Resolving crises through automated bilateral negotiations. Artificial Intelligence 172: 1-18. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004370207001051

Malhoutra, Ankit, and Faizan Ahmad. 2022. Artificial intelligence and international arbitration. Novos Estudos Jurídicos 27: 258-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.14210/nej.v27n2.p258-281

McLaughlin, Mark. 2023. Regulating Artificial Intelligence in International Investment Law. The Journal of World Investment & Trade 24: 256-300. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6249&context=sol_research

Rhim, Young-Yik, and Park KyungBae. 2019. The applicability of artificial intelligence in international law. JE Asia & International Law 12: 7-20. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/jeasil12&div=6&id=&page=

Solhchi, Mohammad Ali, and Baghbanno Faraz. 2023. Artificial intelligence and its role in the development of the future of arbitration. International Journal of Law Changing World 2: 56-65. https://ijlcw.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/56

Treacy, Eoin. 2022. The effectiveness of artificial intelligence in simplification of arbitration proceedings: fiction or seventh seal in the world of arbitration?" International Journal of Law, Ethics and Technology 137. https://ijlet.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2.2.5.pdf

Tsuvina, Tetiana, and Tsuvina, Anna. 2024. Rethinking regulation: integrating large language models in international arbitration. Problems of Legality: 212-225. https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990X.166.315451

Tubishat, Bassam Mustafa Abdul-Rahman. 2024. Cross-cultural challenges in international commercial arbitration: strategies for effective resolution. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology 8: 758-768. https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/2160

Walters, Robert. 2024. Robots replacing human arbitrators: the legal dilemma. Information & Communications Technology Law: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2024.2408155

Wilkenfeld, Jonathan, Sarit Kraus, Kim M. Holley, and Michael A Harris. 1995. GENIE: a decision support system for crisis negotiations. Decision Support Systems 14: 369-391. https://scispace.com/pdf/genie-a-decision-support-system-for-crisis-negotiations-56s8qqarmx.pdf

Zeleznikow, John. 2021. Using artificial intelligence to provide intelligent dispute resolution support. Group Decision and Negotiation 30: 789-812. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10726-021-09734-1

Downloads

Published

2025-07-27

Issue

Section

Articles